Argon vs Krypton Gas: Which Offers Better Rooflight Insulation?

Rooflights play an increasingly important role in modern buildings, not only as sources of natural daylight but as critical components of the thermal envelope. As building regulations tighten and homeowners demand better energy performance, the focus has shifted to what happens between the panes of glass particularly in high-quality systems supplied by Skylights Roof Lanterns. 

One of the most common comparisons in high-performance glazing is argon vs krypton gas windows. Both gases are widely used in insulated glazing units, yet they behave differently, perform best under different conditions, and come with distinct cost implications. 

Understanding how inert gas filling glazing works, how gas selection affects thermal efficiency, and why triple glazing gas type matters for rooflights will help you make better-informed decisions whether you are designing a new build, specifying rooflights, or upgrading an existing property. 

How Inert Gas Filling Improves Rooflight Performance 

The Principle Behind Gas-Filled Glazing 

Inert gas filling glazing replaces ordinary air between glass panes with gases that conduct less heat. Because these gases are heavier and more stable than air, they reduce heat transfer by limiting both conduction and convection within the glazing cavity. 

Argon and krypton are the most common choices because they are non-toxic, chemically inert, and capable of delivering measurable insulation improvements without altering the appearance of the rooflight. 

Why Rooflights Are More Sensitive Than Windows 

Rooflights experience greater thermal stress than vertical windows. They are exposed to more direct solar radiation, greater temperature fluctuations, and stronger wind effects. As a result, the insulating gas used within the glazing has a greater influence on overall performance. A gas choice that performs adequately in a window may deliver noticeably different results in a rooflight, particularly in terms of winter heat loss and summer heat control. For example, high-performance polycarbonate rooflights can benefit significantly from carefully selected gas filling to maximise insulation and energy efficiency. 

Argon Gas: Reliable and Widely Used 

What Makes Argon So Popular? 

Argon is the most commonly used gas in insulated glazing units. It is abundant, relatively inexpensive, and offers a significant improvement in insulation when compared to air-filled units. 

For most residential rooflights, argon provides an effective balance between performance and cost. 

Thermal Efficiency of Argon Gas 

From a thermal efficiency gas standpoint, argon reduces heat transfer by slowing down air movement within the cavity. It performs best in glazing cavities of around 16 to 20 millimetres, which are typical in many double- and triple-glazed rooflights. 

In practical terms, argon-filled rooflights achieve good U-values that comfortably meet current building regulations and energy-efficiency standards. 

Suitability for Rooflight Applications 

Argon is particularly well suited to larger rooflights, where cavity widths can be optimised without compromising structural strength or aesthetics. It is also the default choice for most standard triple-glazed rooflights, where it delivers strong performance without driving costs too high. 

Krypton Gas: High Performance in Compact Designs 

Understanding Krypton Gas 

Krypton is a much denser and rarer inert gas than argon. Because of this higher density, it is even more effective at limiting heat transfer inside glazing units. 

This makes krypton especially attractive for applications where glazing cavities must be kept narrow, such as slim-profile rooflights or high-end architectural designs. 

Thermal Efficiency Advantages of Krypton 

When comparing argon vs krypton gas windows, krypton consistently outperforms argon in laboratory conditions. It suppresses convection more effectively and reduces conductive heat transfer, leading to lower U-values. 

However, its performance advantage is most pronounced in cavities between 8 and 12 millimetres. In wider cavities, the difference between krypton and argon becomes less significant. 

Where Krypton Is Most Effective 

Krypton is commonly specified in premium rooflight systems, Passivhaus projects, and situations where space constraints limit glazing thickness. In these contexts, its superior insulating properties justify the higher cost. 

Argon vs Krypton Gas Windows: Key Differences at a Glance 

The table below highlights how argon and krypton compare across key performance and specification criteria: 

This comparison shows that while krypton offers superior insulation, argon remains the more practical option for most rooflight installations. 

Triple Glazing and Gas Selection 

Why Gas Type Matters More in Triple Glazing 

The triple glazing gas type becomes increasingly important as more panes are added. Triple-glazed rooflights contain two sealed cavities, doubling the influence of gas selection on thermal performance. 

Argon-filled triple glazing already delivers excellent insulation and is sufficient for most residential and commercial applications. 

Krypton in Triple-Glazed Rooflights 

Krypton-filled triple glazing can push thermal performance even further, achieving ultra-low U-values. This is particularly useful where planning constraints or design requirements limit the thickness of the rooflight. 

That said, the incremental performance gain over argon-filled triple glazing is often modest when compared to the additional cost. 

U-Values and Real-World Thermal Performance 

How Gas Choice Influences U-Values 

U-values measure how much heat passes through a building element. Gas filling improves U-values by stabilising the airspace between panes and reducing heat movement. 

While krypton can lower U-values slightly more than argon, the overall rooflight performance also depends heavily on other factors, including low-emissivity coatings, spacer bars, frame insulation, and installation quality. 

Diminishing Returns in Practice 

In real-world rooflight installations, the difference between argon and krypton is often less noticeable than expected. For large rooflights with standard cavity widths, upgrading from argon to krypton may result in only marginal thermal improvements. 

In many cases, investing in better frame insulation or glazing coatings delivers greater benefits than upgrading the gas alone, especially when combined with stylish rooflight solutions for home extensions. 

Cost, Value, and Long-Term Performance 

Understanding the Cost Difference 

Krypton is significantly more expensive than argon due to its rarity and complex extraction process. This cost is reflected in the final price of the rooflight, particularly for larger glazed areas. 

Argon, by contrast, offers strong performance at a much lower cost, making it the default choice for most projects. 

Durability and Gas Retention 

Both gases are stable and long-lasting when used in high-quality insulated glazing units. Gas loss over time is minimal if manufacturing standards and edge seals are properly maintained. 

In terms of longevity, there is little difference between argon and krypton—the quality of the glazing unit matters far more than the gas itself. 

Environmental Considerations 

Argon has a lower environmental impact due to its abundance and simpler production process. Krypton’s higher embodied energy makes it less attractive from a sustainability standpoint unless its enhanced insulation directly offsets operational energy use. 

For environmentally conscious projects, argon-filled glazing often provides the best balance between performance and sustainability. 

Choosing the Right Gas for Your Rooflight 

Selecting between argon and krypton should be driven by the specific requirements of the project. Rooflight size, glazing thickness, thermal targets, and budget all play a role. 

For most residential and commercial rooflights, argon delivers excellent insulation and long-term value. Krypton is best reserved for specialist applications where space is limited and maximum thermal performance is essential. 

Conclusion: 

In the debate over argon vs krypton gas windows, krypton is the technical winner in terms of pure insulation performance. However, argon remains the most practical and cost-effective solution for the majority of rooflight applications. 

By understanding how inert gas filling glazing improves insulation, how gas choice affects thermal efficiency, and when a specific triple glazing gas type is justified, designers and homeowners can make confident, informed decisions. 

In most cases, the “best” gas is not the most advanced one but the one that aligns with the rooflight design, performance goals, and budget. 

Sign up today to receive the latest news, product launches, and expert advice from Skylights Roof Lanterns.